header-logo header-logo

17 October 2025 / Ludovica Pizzetti , Agnieszka Marciniak
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Competition , Employment
printer mail-detail

You’re acqui-hired!

232360
In today’s rapidly evolving mergers & acquisitions landscape, deal structures are becoming more targeted, write Ludovica Pizzetti & Agnieszka Marciniak
  • ‘Acqui-hires’ are increasingly common—particularly in AI and frontier technologies—and are likely to come under antitrust scrutiny.
  • Microsoft’s recent acqui-hire of Inflection AI is an example of acqui-hire that has captured the attention of authorities around the world.

In today’s rapidly evolving mergers and acquisitions (M&A) landscape, traditional transactions are increasingly being replaced by more targeted and flexible deal structures, such as asset deals, ‘acqui-hires’ and IP licensing arrangements. These allow companies to acquire specific components of a business, such as talent, technology, data, or specific compounds (which may not necessarily, by themselves, generate revenue), without taking on an entire entity or a shareholding thereof.

While the acquisition of ‘bare’ physical assets (such as office equipment, vehicle fleets or warehouse space) is unlikely to engage merger control rules, such targeted transactions may be viewed by regulators as substantially equivalent to a full merger and therefore may be subject to antitrust scrutiny—particularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll