header-logo header-logo

You’re acqui-hired!

17 October 2025 / Ludovica Pizzetti , Agnieszka Marciniak
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Competition , Employment
printer mail-detail
232360
In today’s rapidly evolving mergers & acquisitions landscape, deal structures are becoming more targeted, write Ludovica Pizzetti & Agnieszka Marciniak
  • ‘Acqui-hires’ are increasingly common—particularly in AI and frontier technologies—and are likely to come under antitrust scrutiny.
  • Microsoft’s recent acqui-hire of Inflection AI is an example of acqui-hire that has captured the attention of authorities around the world.

In today’s rapidly evolving mergers and acquisitions (M&A) landscape, traditional transactions are increasingly being replaced by more targeted and flexible deal structures, such as asset deals, ‘acqui-hires’ and IP licensing arrangements. These allow companies to acquire specific components of a business, such as talent, technology, data, or specific compounds (which may not necessarily, by themselves, generate revenue), without taking on an entire entity or a shareholding thereof.

While the acquisition of ‘bare’ physical assets (such as office equipment, vehicle fleets or warehouse space) is unlikely to engage merger control rules, such targeted transactions may be viewed by regulators as substantially equivalent to a full merger and therefore may be subject to antitrust scrutiny—particularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll