header-logo header-logo

17 October 2025 / Ludovica Pizzetti , Agnieszka Marciniak
Issue: 8135 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Competition , Employment
printer mail-detail

You’re acqui-hired!

232360
In today’s rapidly evolving mergers & acquisitions landscape, deal structures are becoming more targeted, write Ludovica Pizzetti & Agnieszka Marciniak
  • ‘Acqui-hires’ are increasingly common—particularly in AI and frontier technologies—and are likely to come under antitrust scrutiny.
  • Microsoft’s recent acqui-hire of Inflection AI is an example of acqui-hire that has captured the attention of authorities around the world.

In today’s rapidly evolving mergers and acquisitions (M&A) landscape, traditional transactions are increasingly being replaced by more targeted and flexible deal structures, such as asset deals, ‘acqui-hires’ and IP licensing arrangements. These allow companies to acquire specific components of a business, such as talent, technology, data, or specific compounds (which may not necessarily, by themselves, generate revenue), without taking on an entire entity or a shareholding thereof.

While the acquisition of ‘bare’ physical assets (such as office equipment, vehicle fleets or warehouse space) is unlikely to engage merger control rules, such targeted transactions may be viewed by regulators as substantially equivalent to a full merger and therefore may be subject to antitrust scrutiny—particularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll