header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 7675

06 November 2015
IN THIS ISSUE

Peter Causton examines the new mediation regime for handling complaints against lawyers

Bao Xiang International Garment Center and others v British Airways plc [2015] EWHC 3071 (Ch), [2015] All ER (D) 232 (Oct)

Chris Syder discusses the TUC’s challenge to the Trade Union Bill

Samuels v Birmingham City Council [2015] EWCA Civ 1051, [2015] All ER (D) 230 (Oct)

Sorry seems to be the hardest word, observes Dominic Regan

B v M (1) [2015] EWHC 2941 (Fam), [2015] All ER (D) 221 (Oct)

DMWSHNZ Ltd (In Members’ Voluntary Liquidation) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2015] EWCA Civ 1036, [2015] All ER (D) 191 (Oct)

Tarakhil v Home Office [2015] EWHC 2845 (QB), [2015] All ER (D) 194 (Oct)

Occupying separate floors: an underrated way of doing business? ask Joseph Ollech & James Tipler

T & A Textiles and Hosiery Ltd v Hala Textile UK Ltd and others [2015] EWHC 2888 (IPEC), [2015] All ER (D) 217 (Oct)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll