header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7711

12 August 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

The future of legal aid & litigants in person: can we safeguard access to justice?

Why have the dynamics of the Hinkley Point C negotiation changed since the EU referendum, asks Tim Malloch

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

    Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

    Firm strengthens growth strategy and group litigation capability with senior hires

    Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

    Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

    Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

    Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

    Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

    Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

    NEWS
    The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
    A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
    Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
    Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
    New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
    back-to-top-scroll