header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7711

12 August 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

The future of legal aid & litigants in person: can we safeguard access to justice?

Why have the dynamics of the Hinkley Point C negotiation changed since the EU referendum, asks Tim Malloch

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Birketts—Michael Conway

    Birketts—Michael Conway

    IP partner joins team in Bristol to lead branding and trade marks practice

    Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

    Blake Morgan—Daniel Church

    Succession and tax team welcomes partner inLondon

    Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

    Maguire Family Law—Jennifer Hudec

    Firm appoints senior associate to lead Manchester city centre team

    NEWS
    Ministers’ proposals to raise funds by seizing interest on lawyers’ client account schemes could ‘cause firms to close’, solicitors have warned
    Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
    Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
    A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
    The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
    back-to-top-scroll