header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7754

13 July 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

RFC 2012 Plc (in liquidation) (formerly Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland [2017] UKSC 45, [2017] All ER (D) 19 (Jul)

Welch v Welch [2017] All ER (D) 27 (Jul), [2017] Lexis Citation 140

Re CB (International Relocation: Domestic Abuse: Child Arrangements) [2017] EWFC 39, [2017] All ER (D) 37 (Jul)

Gard and others v United Kingdom (App. No. 39793/17) [2017] ECHR 39793/17, [2017] All ER (D) 165 (Jun)

R (on the application of DS (through his mother and litigation friend SS)) v Wolverhampton City Council[2017] EWHC 1660 (Admin ), [2017] All ER (D) 30 (Jul)

R (on the application of AB (a child, by his Litigation Friend)) v Secretary of State for Justice (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening) [2017] EWHC 1694 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 5 (Jul)

Mahfouz and others v El-Rashid and others [2017] EWHC 1460 (Comm), [2017] All ER (D) 29 (Jul)

Ten common legal marketing pitfalls & how to avoid them. A masterclass by James Noble

Chris Ronan, chief executive at St John’s Buildings, shares some tips for setting a strategy for success

Today’s ‘Luddites’ need to find imaginative & effective solutions to opposing change, says Geoffrey Bindman

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll