header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 157, Issue 7277

14 June 2007
IN THIS ISSUE

Islington London Borough Council v Honeygan-Green [2007] EWHC 1270 (QB), [2007] All ER (D) 458 (May)

Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council [2007] EWCA Civ 446, [2007] All ER (D) 214 (May)

R v Considine [2007] EWCA Crim 1166, [2007] All ER (D) 28 (Jun)

The High Court has thrown out a legal challenge to the government’s plans for 17 super-casinos.

R v Green [2007] EWCA Crim 1248, [2007] All ER (D) 439 (May)

HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMMIGRATION

Jury trials in England and Wales are “fair, unbiased and balanced”, research shows.

Chancel repair searches are no longer an optional extra. Matt Le Breton explains why

McMenemy v Capita Business Services Ltd [2007] CSIH 25, [2007] IRLR 400

What does the new service charge code mean for property managers…and landlords? Julien Allen reports

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll