header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7317

17 April 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

News In Brief

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (proceedings under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005) [2008] EWHC 689 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 114 (Apr)

R (on the application of Griffin) v Richmond Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 84 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 181 (Jan)

James v London Borough of Greenwich [2008] EWCA Civ 35, [2008] All ER (D) 54 (Feb)

Re S (a child) (expert evidence) [2008] All ER (D) 51 (Mar)

Dunlop Haywards Ltd v Erinaceous Insurance Services Ltd [2008] EWHC 520 (Comm), [2008] All ER (D) 11 (Apr)

R v R [2008] EWCA Crim 678, [2008] All ER (D) 61 (Apr)

Aribisala v St James’ Homes (Grosvenor Dock) Ltd [2008] EWHC 456 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 201 (Mar)

R (on the application of Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] EWHC 714 (Admin)

R v Mitchell [2008] All ER (D) 109 (Apr)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll