header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7317

17 April 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

Lambeth London Borough Council v TK (sub nom K v A Local Authority) [2008] EWCA Civ 103, [2008] All ER (D) 308 (Feb)

R v C [2007] EWCA Crim 2859, [2008] All ER (D) 19 (Apr)

Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] EWCA Civ 196, [2008] All ER (D) 293 (Mar)

Gemma Ltd v Davies [2008] EWHC 546 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 216 (Mar)

Forsyth-Grant v Allen [2008] All ER (D) 110 (Apr)

M & J Polymers Ltd v Imerys Minerals Ltd [2008] EWHC 344 (Comm), [2008] All ER (D) 445 (Feb)

Whitehead v Hibbert Pownall & Newton [2008] All ER (D) 60 (Apr)

Panday v Virgil [2008] UKPC 24, [2008] All ER (D) 120 (Apr)

Amendment No 19 to the Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction (Forms of Notice of Intention to Apply for Certain Behaviour Orders if the Defendant is Convicted and Proposed Application) [2008] All ER (D) 292 (Mar)

Section 31 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 is amended (by s 141 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll