header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 158, Issue 7317

17 April 2008
IN THIS ISSUE

Director of Public Prosecutions v Johnson [2008] EWHC 509 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 371 (Feb)

Pipe v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2008] EWHC 646 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 58 (Apr)

Nearly all residential leasehold flats will suffer a drop in value following a recent Court of Appeal ruling, says Glyn Crews

Will proposals regarding inquests in the Counter-Terrorism Bill breach human rights laws? Cathryn McGahey and Bilal Rawat investigate

Andrew Francis examines why the rights of light law needs changing and what form such reform should take

News In Brief

News In Brief

What redress is available to a misled property buyer? Anthony Judge investigates

Jennifer James relates a torrid tale of shrivelled roasts and soggy confetti

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll