header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 162, Issue 7527

16 August 2012
IN THIS ISSUE

Richard Moorhead toys with ethical dilemmas & regulatory barriers

Andy Cottle explains why baseball arbitration may fail to win over the Brits

Peter Whitman debates the pros & cons of selecting your own tribunal

Establishing the proper law of an arbitration agreement is key, says Khawar Qureshi QC

In the final of three articles Margaret Tofalides & Clare Arthurs discuss s 69 arbitration challenges

James Wilson slams state meddling in the taste buds of a nation

Mediation should be the nanny in the nursery of matrimonial disputes, says Paul Tweed

Paul Fisher shares his views on how to avert a pro bono crisis

David Locke reports from the client’s side of the road

Law Society fights bank’s conveyancing panel cull

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll