header-logo header-logo

caroline_field_jlsla_and_fox_lawyers

Caroline Field

Senior associate

Caroline Field, president of the Junior LSLA & senior associate at City law firm, Fox Lawyers (cfield@foxlawyers.comwww.foxlawyers.com)

Senior associate

Caroline Field, president of the Junior LSLA & senior associate at City law firm, Fox Lawyers (cfield@foxlawyers.comwww.foxlawyers.com)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Caroline Field covers recent developments in the use of non-compete clauses to control ex-employees
Caroline Field explains why delaying agreement of undertakings doesn’t pay…& may cost

Are litigators heading for extinction with the rise of technology assisted review, asks Caroline Field

Caroline Field predicts some of the litigation challenges for the year ahead

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll