header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022 / Caroline Field
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Interim injunction in employee competition cases

82718
Caroline Field explains why delaying agreement of undertakings doesn’t pay…& may cost
  • Covers employee competition cases, specifically interim injunctions granted pending further exploration at trial.
  • Offers practical advice and covers recent caselaw.

Injunctions to stop employees commencing employment with a competitor in breach of a non-compete are routinely granted by the courts. Often, this is in recognition of the difficulties of policing compliance with other covenants and breach of confidentiality claims where confidentiality is the legitimate interest the employer is seeking to protect. An interim injunction ‘holds the ring’ until matters can be fully explored at trial. Enforceability of the covenant (including examination of meaning, whether it goes no further than reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate interest and/or whether a repudiatory breach of contract has caused the covenant to fall away) will typically be considered at trial. Claims follow a familiar pattern.

Pursuant to the rules set down in American Cynamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] 1 ALL ER 504, [1975] AC 396, the court’s threshold for granting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll