header-logo header-logo

27 May 2022 / Caroline Field
Issue: 7980 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Interim injunction in employee competition cases

82718
Caroline Field explains why delaying agreement of undertakings doesn’t pay…& may cost
  • Covers employee competition cases, specifically interim injunctions granted pending further exploration at trial.
  • Offers practical advice and covers recent caselaw.

Injunctions to stop employees commencing employment with a competitor in breach of a non-compete are routinely granted by the courts. Often, this is in recognition of the difficulties of policing compliance with other covenants and breach of confidentiality claims where confidentiality is the legitimate interest the employer is seeking to protect. An interim injunction ‘holds the ring’ until matters can be fully explored at trial. Enforceability of the covenant (including examination of meaning, whether it goes no further than reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate interest and/or whether a repudiatory breach of contract has caused the covenant to fall away) will typically be considered at trial. Claims follow a familiar pattern.

Pursuant to the rules set down in American Cynamid Co v Ethicon Ltd [1975] 1 ALL ER 504, [1975] AC 396, the court’s threshold for granting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll