header-logo header-logo

penny_cooper

Penny Cooper

Professor of law

Penny Cooper, professor of law, Kingston University London (P.Cooper@kingston.ac.uk; www.law.kingston.ac.uk)

Professor of law

Penny Cooper, professor of law, Kingston University London (P.Cooper@kingston.ac.uk; www.law.kingston.ac.uk)

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Is virtual witness testimony legal fact or largely fiction, asks Penny Cooper

Goodbye expert witness immunity, hello higher insurance premiums, says Penny Cooper

Penny Cooper considers the implications of the Public Law Outline

Penny Cooper puts expert witness training in the dock

Does expert witness training meet the needs of expert witnesses or the needs of the training providers, Penny Cooper asks

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll