header-logo header-logo

The right protocol?

24 July 2008 / Penny Cooper
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Penny Cooper considers the implications of the Public Law Outline

On 1 April 2008 the Public Law Outline (The PLO) Guide to Case Management in Public Law Proceedings replaced The Protocol for Judicial Case Management in Public Law Children Act Cases. On the same date the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) introduced revised statutory guidance for care and supervision order proceedings (“Court Orders” of the Children Act guidance under s 7 of the Local Authority Social Services Act 1970) and a new practice direction for the use and instruction of experts in family proceedings relating to children. These three documents are designed to complement each other and can be found at www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/careproceedings.htm.

What's Behind the PLO?

The PLO needs to be seen in the context of the last 17 years; in October 1991 the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) came into force, bringing a much greater emphasis on trying to keep families together, proactive case management by the courts and avoiding delay in care proceedings. It was envisaged that under ChA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll