header-logo header-logo

Landlord&tenant

Subscribe

Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel [2008] EWHC 1688, [2008] All ER (D) 274 (Jul)

R (Weaver) v London and Quadrant Housing Trust [2008] EWHC 1377 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 307 (Jun)

Jones v London Borough of Merton [2008] EWCA Civ 660, [2008] All ER (D) 185 (Jun)

Practitioners should prepare carefully before making LTA 1985 dispensation applications, say Adam Colenso and Desmond Kilcoyne

R (on the application of Daniel Thwaites plc) v Wirral Borough Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 838 (Admin), [2008] All ER (D) 61 (May)

Glyn Crews continues his analysis of the effect a recent Court of Appeal ruling has had on residential leases and freeholders

Nearly all residential leasehold flats will suffer a drop in value following a recent Court of Appeal ruling, says Glyn Crews

Daniel Dovar and Michael Walsh give their verdict on the tenancy deposit scheme, one year on

SHARED OWNERSHIP LEASES, RICHARDSON V MIDLAND HEART LTD

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll