header-logo header-logo

Julian Miller & Sara Robertson advocate honesty and openness from the outset of insurance policies

It’s a £3.5m question: “Is a teacake a biscuit or a cake?”

HMRC Production Orders have changed. Maria Piggin explains how

Peter Vaines is intrugued by a Revenue U-turn and the meaning of residency

Taxation

Alistair Darling and the Pre Budget Report proved to be a disappointing combination, says Peter Vaines

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Khawaja [2008] EWHC 1687 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 227 (Jul)

Leisure Pass Group Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2008] EWCH 2158 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 55 (Sep)

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Xicom Systems Ltd [2008] EWHC 1945 (Ch), [2008] All ER (D) 39 (Aug)

Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Allad [2008] EWCA Crim 1741, [2008] All ER (D) 407 (Jul)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll