header-logo header-logo

C21 London Estates Ltd v Maurice MacNeill Iona Ltd [2017] EWHC 998 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 142 (Jun)

Astex Therapeutics Ltd v Astrazeneca AB [2017] EWHC 1442 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 118 (Jun)

Lobo v Corich; Corich v Lobo [2017] EWHC 1438 (TCC), [2017] All ER (D) 132 (Jun)

R (on the application of Hayes) v City of York Council [2017] EWHC 1374 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 53 (Jun)

Re K (REMO – Power of Magistrates to Issue Bench Warrant) [2017] EWFC 27 [2017] All ER (D) 156 (May)

Baker Tilly UK Audit LLP and others v Financial Reporting Council and others [2017] EWCA Civ 406, [2017] All ER (D) 47 (Jun)

Co-Operative Bank plc v Phillips [2017] EWHC 1320 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 50 (Jun)

R (on the application of C) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1288 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 16 (Jun)

Richard v British Broadcasting Corporation and another [2017] EWHC 1291 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 33 (Jun)

Anglia Research Services Ltd and others v Finders Genealogists Ltd and another [2017] EWHC 1277 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 37 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury expands private client and family office platform with Cadwalader partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll