header-logo header-logo

1 July 2025: Hague Judgments Day

28 March 2025 / Natalie Todd
Issue: 8110 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , International , Commercial , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail
212898
If widely ratified, Hague 2019 will enhance global access to justice, writes Natalie Todd
  • Summarises when Hague 2019 will apply in England and Wales, which judgments are covered, the ‘jurisdictional filters’ that apply in order to ensure enforcement is mandatory, and the grounds for refusal.
  • Also sets out the procedure to be followed, as well as the contracting states and those that are yet to ratify Hague 2019.

In the international world we now operate in, defendants have assets in multiple jurisdictions. It would simplify matters enormously if a claimant could obtain a judgment against the defendant and then enforce that judgment in other countries where assets are held. This can be a complicated process given that each country has its own rules determining whether and how foreign judgments can be enforced. There can be significant delays and expense in following local enforcement processes in multiple countries.

The 2019 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (Hague 2019)

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Moore Barlow—Jess Ready & Natasha Jones

Commercial property and corporate teams expand in Southampton

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Watershed—Rob Elliott

Employment firm expands capability with experienced hire

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Devonshires—Aoife Murphy & Mandeep Sahota

Housing management and property litigation team bolstered by partner hires

NEWS
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll