header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

The 2008 Guideline Rates and Fees

2008 (interim) Guideline Rates for Summary Assessment

The Advisory Committee on Civil Costs is currently conducting thorough research into the guideline hourly rates for solicitors, with a view to issuing a new set of rates by mid 2008.

 

As the current rates expired on 31 December 2007, Sir Anthony Clarke, the master of the rolls, asked the committee to advise him as to how the rates should be set for the interim period.

 

Professor Stephen Nickell, chair of the advisory committee, wrote to the MR stating that in the committee’s view the rates should be increased by 4% to keep them in line with the average earnings in private sector services. A copy of Professor Nickell’s letter is reproduced here (see below).

 

There are four grades of fee earner:

 

A. Solicitors with over eight years’ post qualification experience including at least eight years’ litigation experience.

B. Solicitors and legal executives with over four years’ post qualification experience including at least four years’ litigation experience.

C. Other solicitors and legal executives and fee earners of equivalent experience.

D. Trainee solicitors, paralegals and fee earners of equivalent experience. Note: legal executive means a Fellow of the Institute of Legal Executives.

 

** An hourly rate in excess of the guideline figures may be appropriate for Grade A fee earners in substantial and complex litigation where other factors, including the value of the litigation, the level of complexity, the urgency or importance of the matter as well as any international element would justify a significantly higher rate to reflect higher average costs.

 

Band 1

 

GUIDELINE RATES (£)

 

A** - 203; B180; C – 151; D - 110

 

Aldershot, Farnham, Bournemouth (including Poole); Birmingham Inner; Bristol; Cambridge City, Harlow; Canterbury, Maidstone, Medway & Tunbridge Wells; Cardiff (Inner); Chelmsford South, Essex & East Suffolk; Chester; Fareham, Winchester; Hampshire, Dorset, Wiltshire, Isle of Wight; Kingston, Guildford, Reigate, Epsom; Leeds Inner (within two kilometres radius of the City Art Gallery); Lewes; Liverpool, Birkenhead; Manchester Central; Newcastle—City Centre (within a 2 mile radius of St Nicholas Cathedral); Norwich City; Nottingham City; Oxford, Thames Valley; Southampton, Portsmouth; Swindon, Basingstoke; Watford

 

 

Band 2

 

GUIDELINE RATES (£)

 

A** - 191; B168; C – 139; D - 105

 

Bath, Cheltenham and Gloucester, Taunton, Yeovil; Bury; Chelmsford North, Cambridge County, Peterborough, Bury St E, Norfolk, Lowestoft; Cheshire & North Wales; Coventry, Rugby, Nuneaton, Stratford and Warwick; Exeter, Plymouth; Hull (City); Leeds Outer, Wakefield & Pontefract; Leigh; Lincoln; Luton, Bedford, St Albans, Hitchin, Hertford; Manchester Outer, Oldham, Bolton, Tameside; Newcastle (other than City Centre); Nottingham & Derbyshire; Sheffield, Doncaster and South Yorkshire; Southport; St Helens; Stockport, Altrincham, Salford; Swansea, Newport, Cardiff (Outer); Wigan; Wolverhampton, Walsall, Dudley & Stourbridge; York, Harrogate

 

 

Band 3

 

GUIDELINE RATES (£)

 

A** - 174; B156; C – 133; D - 99

 

Birmingham Outer; Bradford (Dewsbury, Halifax, Huddersfield, Keighley & Skipton); Cumbria; Devon, Corn-wall; Grimsby, Skegness; Hull Outer; Kidderminster; Northampton & Leicester; Preston, Lancaster, Black-pool, Chorley, Accrington, Burnley, Blackburn, Rawenstall & Nelson; Scarborough & Ripon; Stafford, Stoke, Tamworth; Teesside; Worcester, Hereford, Evesham and Redditch; Shrewsbury, Telford, Ludlow, Oswestry; South & West Wales

 

 

LONDON RATES (£)

 

City of London (EC1, EC2, EC3, EC4) - A - 396; B285; C – 219; D – 134

 

Central London (W1, WC1, WC2. SW1) – A – 304; B – 231; C – 189; D – 121

 

Outer London (All other London post codes: W, NW, N, E, SE, SW, Bromley, Croydon, Dartford, Gravesend and Uxbridge) A – 219–256; B – 165–219; C – 158; D – 116

 

Uprating the Guideline Hourly Rates

 

13 December, 2007

 

Dear Sir Anthony

 

The Advisory Committee on Civil Costs recommends that, as from 1 January, 2008, the guideline hourly rates should be increased by 4 per cent across the board. The Committee was almost unanimous on this. One member, the representative of the insurance industry, was opposed to any uprating. He did not consider it appropriate to make an increase at this point given the fundamental review underway.

 

This recommendation is based on the notion that the guideline rates should keep up with average earnings in private sector services, thereby ensuring that normal relativities are maintained. The ONS Average Earnings Index (AEI) for Private Sector Service industries, excluding bonuses, seasonally adjusted, rose by 4.016% between 2006, Q3 and 2007, Q3. We felt that it was sensible to round down to 4% since the impact is minute.

 

As to where we are on the new guideline rates, we are currently organising a survey and the recommended uprating seemed to most of us to be the most sensible interim measure until we are able to examine the statistical evidence and seek the views of stakeholders, and to use this evidence and these views as a basis for a completely new set of rates. It should not, at this stage, be assumed that the AEI will be used to inform the calculation of rates in the future.

 

All Best Wishes,

 

Stephen Nickell

Nuffield College, Oxford OX1 1NF

 

 

 

 

Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll