header-logo header-logo

2019: claims to fame

23 October 2019 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
9856
Constance McDonnell QC examines the year’s most notable 1975 Act decisions
  • The use of standstill agreements to prevent a claim having to be issued within six months of a grant of representation.
  • The quantification of claims where medical costs are a principal financial need.
  • Applications for interim relief.

2019 has been something of a momentous year so far for practitioners who deal with claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975), with the decision of Mostyn J in Cowan v Foreman [2019] EWHC 349 (Fam) casting doubt over the widely-used practice of ‘standstill agreements’ so as to prevent a claim having to be issued within six months of a grant of representation and to facilitate settlement discussions. The expedited decision of the Court of Appeal in that case should do much to settle concerns about continued use of such agreements, and has clarified the court’s approach to late claims. There has also been some helpful guidance from the court about the quantification of claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll