header-logo header-logo

2019: claims to fame

23 October 2019 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
9856
Constance McDonnell QC examines the year’s most notable 1975 Act decisions
  • The use of standstill agreements to prevent a claim having to be issued within six months of a grant of representation.
  • The quantification of claims where medical costs are a principal financial need.
  • Applications for interim relief.

2019 has been something of a momentous year so far for practitioners who deal with claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975), with the decision of Mostyn J in Cowan v Foreman [2019] EWHC 349 (Fam) casting doubt over the widely-used practice of ‘standstill agreements’ so as to prevent a claim having to be issued within six months of a grant of representation and to facilitate settlement discussions. The expedited decision of the Court of Appeal in that case should do much to settle concerns about continued use of such agreements, and has clarified the court’s approach to late claims. There has also been some helpful guidance from the court about the quantification of claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll