header-logo header-logo

About time?

09 January 2015 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
brydensalter

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter report on a decision which makes a point that many civil practitioners wish had been made in Mitchell

Employment practitioners have been able to let the paroxysms arising out of the judgment in Andrew Mitchell MP v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430 largely pass them by. The intrusion into employment law of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 in the context of relief from sanctions was largely confined to the decision of the Court of Appeal in St Albans Girls’ School & Anor v Neary [2009] EWCA Civ 1214, [2010] 2 Costs LR 191 as further explained in Thind v Salvesen Logistics Ltd (2010) UKEAT/0487/09/DA, [2010] All ER (D) 05 (Sep). However, given the developments in the civil courts following Mitchell , employment lawyers have been holding their collective breath pending consideration by the Employment Appeal Tribunal of an analogous case. That has now taken place, with Mr Justice Langstaff giving his considered view of the applicability of Mitchell to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll