header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Richard Burger
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

An adequate plug?

Richard Burger reports on the FSA's efforts to stop the leak of inside information from the unregulated sector

Last summer the Financial Services Athority (FSA) reviewed the controls over inside information during public takeover and merger transactions (see “Plugging the leaks” 157 NLJ 7287, p 1,222). The review considered how inside information leaks from such transactions, identified good practices to combat these leaks and suggested the introduction of a voluntary code for non-FSA regulated firms who participate in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) work. A year later, the FSA has published a set of Principles of Good Practice (the principles) for the handling of inside information, aimed at the unregulated sector.

The Market Misconduct Problem

The FSA aims to reduce the number of abnormal or informed price movements (IPMs) in advance of significant regulatory and/or takeover announcements to the market by listed companies. According to ongoing FSA research, in 2007 some 28.7% of M&A announcements were preceded by IPMs. It is entirely possible to attribute such movements to accurate financial analysis or deliberate strategic leakage of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll