header-logo header-logo

Adopting the right course

10 June 2011 / John McMullen
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

John McMullen reflects on what’s reasonable in unfair dismissal cases

It has long been settled law that when deciding whether a dismissal is fair or unfair, an employment tribunal should consider the reasonableness of the employer’s conduct and not whether it considers the dismissal to be fair.

The tribunal must not substitute its own view as to what is the right course to adopt for that of the employer. In many, although not all, cases there is a band of reasonable responses to the employee’s conduct or other situation facing the employer within which one employer might take one view and another, quite reasonably, another. If a dismissal falls within the band it is fair. If it falls outside the band it is unfair.

Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones

This canon was laid down by the seminal EAT case of Iceland Frozen Foods Limited v Jones [1982] IRLR 439 (per Browne-Wilkinson P, applying dicta of Lord Denning MR in British Leyland (UK) Ltd v Swift [1981] IRLR 91, CA).

Some 20 years

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll