header-logo header-logo

09 October 2014
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Aero Club business rate reversal

Upper Tribunal overturns President’s landmark decision

A landmark decision on business rates has been overturned by the Lands Chamber (Upper Tribunal). 

In the case, which involved West London Aero Club, the Valuation Tribunal had held that once it had given its decision on the rateable value, that value couldn’t be amended by a valuation officer (VO) even where the officer believes he is correcting an error (regarding the size of a hangar, in this case). The airfield relied on the principle of res judicata or issue estoppel to argue that the officer was not entitled to ignore or impugn the tribunal’s decision.

Ruling in the airfield’s favour, the Tribunal President, Graham Zellick QC considered that “to countenance the valuation officer’s argument would be subversive of the rule of law, an affront to justice, repugnant to the statutory framework”. On appeal, however, the Lands Chamber has reversed the President’s decision ( Valuation Office Agency v West London Aero Club [2014] UKUT 0291 (LC)). It held that res judicata did not apply and a valuation officer can alter a rating list when he becomes aware of a material change in circumstances because he is under a duty to maintain an accurate list. Giving his judgment, Martin Rodger QC said: “A mistake of fact made by the Valuation Tribunal need not be perpetuated.”

Richard Jones, a property consultant who advised the airfield, commented that the Upper Tribunal decision was based “purely on the legalities” of the VO’s actions and powers.

“It also took into account a previous Valuation Tribunal ruling and the impact of this on the VO’s ability to alter the 2005 rating list. However, no consideration was given to the correctness or otherwise of the confirmed overall rateable value in light of comparable properties, nor to any quantum value reduction in relation to the increased areas of the hangars,” he added.

Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll