header-logo header-logo

09 October 2014
Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Aero Club business rate reversal

Upper Tribunal overturns President’s landmark decision

A landmark decision on business rates has been overturned by the Lands Chamber (Upper Tribunal). 

In the case, which involved West London Aero Club, the Valuation Tribunal had held that once it had given its decision on the rateable value, that value couldn’t be amended by a valuation officer (VO) even where the officer believes he is correcting an error (regarding the size of a hangar, in this case). The airfield relied on the principle of res judicata or issue estoppel to argue that the officer was not entitled to ignore or impugn the tribunal’s decision.

Ruling in the airfield’s favour, the Tribunal President, Graham Zellick QC considered that “to countenance the valuation officer’s argument would be subversive of the rule of law, an affront to justice, repugnant to the statutory framework”. On appeal, however, the Lands Chamber has reversed the President’s decision ( Valuation Office Agency v West London Aero Club [2014] UKUT 0291 (LC)). It held that res judicata did not apply and a valuation officer can alter a rating list when he becomes aware of a material change in circumstances because he is under a duty to maintain an accurate list. Giving his judgment, Martin Rodger QC said: “A mistake of fact made by the Valuation Tribunal need not be perpetuated.”

Richard Jones, a property consultant who advised the airfield, commented that the Upper Tribunal decision was based “purely on the legalities” of the VO’s actions and powers.

“It also took into account a previous Valuation Tribunal ruling and the impact of this on the VO’s ability to alter the 2005 rating list. However, no consideration was given to the correctness or otherwise of the confirmed overall rateable value in light of comparable properties, nor to any quantum value reduction in relation to the increased areas of the hangars,” he added.

Issue: 7625 / Categories: Legal News , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll