header-logo header-logo

29 November 2023
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Patents
printer mail-detail

AI patent allowed for the first time

The High Court has handed down a landmark ruling on artificial intelligence (AI), which will allow key aspects of AI to be patented in the UK for the first time

The court held both artificial neural networks (ANNs), which create sentient-like user experiences through technology, and the training of ANNs are patentable in the UK.

The intellectual property belongs to London-based creative studio AI Venture Studio Time Machine Capital Squared (TMC2) and its subsidiary company Emotional Perception AI Ltd (EPAI). EPAI filed a patent application in 2019 for a novel technique that permits the trained ANN to align its output closer towards how a human semantically perceives content. The application was rejected on the basis the Patents Act 1977, s 1(2)(c) excludes ‘a program for a computer… as such’ from protection.

Granting the appeal in EPAI v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch) this week, Sir Anthony Mann said: ‘The courts have had to grapple from time to time with the difficulties of this concept in relation to what I can call traditional computers and software. This appeal raises new questions… I am told that this issue has not yet arisen in any of the authorities.’

Sir Anthony concluded that he considered ‘insofar as necessary, the trained hardware ANN is capable of being an external technical effect which prevents the exclusion applying to any prior computer program’.

TMC2 said the ruling would be important for the markets and banking sectors where emotional perception is being developed for natural language processing economic and financial crime detection and sentiment analysis.  

Bruce Dearling, TMC2 patent attorney, said: ‘This ruling opens the door for UK AI to now accelerate and puts the UK on a better global footing to reward technical innovation. The impact of this decision and any related patent cannot be understated.’ 

Issue: 8051 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Patents
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Jean-François Le Gal

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Jean-François Le Gal

Penningtons Manches Cooper strengthens international disputes team with appointment of leading arbitration partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Aaron Sanders & Kate Saunders

Shakespeare Martineau—Aaron Sanders & Kate Saunders

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens trust and estates disputes team with new appointments

Bellevue Law—Shannon Moore

Bellevue Law—Shannon Moore

Bellevue Law strengthens employment disputes and international advisory capability with senior associate appointment

NEWS
More than 500 former rugby players can pursue brain injury claims despite serious failures to disclose documents ordered by the High Court
Developers in areas with poorly performing councils can apply directly to the Planning Inspectorate for permission under section 62A of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
When does a solicitor’s retainer become a contentious business agreement? The Court of Appeal’s decision in Broadfield Law UK LLP v Barnes shows that listing hourly rates alone will not do, leaving firms and clients uncertain about their rights over bills
MPs cannot simply resign their Commons seats. Instead, they take a nominal Crown office, usually the Chiltern Hundreds or Manor of Northstead, which disqualifies them from sitting
The Thirlwall Inquiry has exposed a ‘complete failure’ to protect babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital, but its recommendations must now be put into practice
back-to-top-scroll