header-logo header-logo

AI patent allowed for the first time

29 November 2023
Issue: 8051 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Patents
printer mail-detail
The High Court has handed down a landmark ruling on artificial intelligence (AI), which will allow key aspects of AI to be patented in the UK for the first time

The court held both artificial neural networks (ANNs), which create sentient-like user experiences through technology, and the training of ANNs are patentable in the UK.

The intellectual property belongs to London-based creative studio AI Venture Studio Time Machine Capital Squared (TMC2) and its subsidiary company Emotional Perception AI Ltd (EPAI). EPAI filed a patent application in 2019 for a novel technique that permits the trained ANN to align its output closer towards how a human semantically perceives content. The application was rejected on the basis the Patents Act 1977, s 1(2)(c) excludes ‘a program for a computer… as such’ from protection.

Granting the appeal in EPAI v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch) this week, Sir Anthony Mann said: ‘The courts have had to grapple from time to time with the difficulties of this concept in relation to what I can call traditional computers and software. This appeal raises new questions… I am told that this issue has not yet arisen in any of the authorities.’

Sir Anthony concluded that he considered ‘insofar as necessary, the trained hardware ANN is capable of being an external technical effect which prevents the exclusion applying to any prior computer program’.

TMC2 said the ruling would be important for the markets and banking sectors where emotional perception is being developed for natural language processing economic and financial crime detection and sentiment analysis.  

Bruce Dearling, TMC2 patent attorney, said: ‘This ruling opens the door for UK AI to now accelerate and puts the UK on a better global footing to reward technical innovation. The impact of this decision and any related patent cannot be understated.’ 

Issue: 8051 / Categories: Legal News , Artificial intelligence , Patents
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll