header-logo header-logo

03 April 2008 / Simon Young
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

All change ahead

Practitioners need to prepare for a new legal landscape, says Simon Young

In November last year the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) issued a consultation paper on the new forms of practice and regulation which will flow from the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007). Broadly these are legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) which are expected to start in the spring of 2009 and alternative business structures (ABSs) which will not be with us until 2011 or 2012. Although that particular consultation closed in December last year, it spawned eight further SRA consultations, which will all impact on the future of our profession.

One of the significant responses submitted to the SRA in respect of its initial consultation came from the ’s Legal Services Policy Institute, led by Professor Stephen Mayson and this article examines some of the issues canvassed in the institute’s response.

The initial consultation proposed a structural shift in regulatory emphasis from the regulation of individuals to the regulation of the entities within which those individuals practise.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll