header-logo header-logo

03 April 2008 / Simon Young
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

All change ahead

Practitioners need to prepare for a new legal landscape, says Simon Young

In November last year the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) issued a consultation paper on the new forms of practice and regulation which will flow from the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007). Broadly these are legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) which are expected to start in the spring of 2009 and alternative business structures (ABSs) which will not be with us until 2011 or 2012. Although that particular consultation closed in December last year, it spawned eight further SRA consultations, which will all impact on the future of our profession.

One of the significant responses submitted to the SRA in respect of its initial consultation came from the ’s Legal Services Policy Institute, led by Professor Stephen Mayson and this article examines some of the issues canvassed in the institute’s response.

The initial consultation proposed a structural shift in regulatory emphasis from the regulation of individuals to the regulation of the entities within which those individuals practise.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll