header-logo header-logo

03 April 2008 / Simon Young
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

All change ahead

Practitioners need to prepare for a new legal landscape, says Simon Young

In November last year the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) issued a consultation paper on the new forms of practice and regulation which will flow from the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007). Broadly these are legal disciplinary practices (LDPs) which are expected to start in the spring of 2009 and alternative business structures (ABSs) which will not be with us until 2011 or 2012. Although that particular consultation closed in December last year, it spawned eight further SRA consultations, which will all impact on the future of our profession.

One of the significant responses submitted to the SRA in respect of its initial consultation came from the ’s Legal Services Policy Institute, led by Professor Stephen Mayson and this article examines some of the issues canvassed in the institute’s response.

The initial consultation proposed a structural shift in regulatory emphasis from the regulation of individuals to the regulation of the entities within which those individuals practise.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll