header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

PT Theiss Contractord Indonesia v PT Kaltim Prima Coal and another [2011] EWHC 1842 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 143 (Jul)

A stay should be granted pursuant to s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 if the proceedings were “in respect of a matter which under the [arbitration] agreement is to be referred to arbitration”. In considering how that question was to be determined, the court should consider the substance of the controversy as it appeared from the circumstances in evidence on the application (and not just the particular terms in which the claimant had sought to formulate its claim in court).

It was also clear law that the construction of an arbitration agreement should start from the assumption that the parties, as rational business people, had been likely to have intended any dispute arising out of the relationship into which they had entered or purported to enter to be decided by the same tribunal. However, where there were multiple related agreements, the task of the court in determining whether a dispute fell within the jurisdiction clauses of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll