header-logo header-logo

Arbitration

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

PT Theiss Contractord Indonesia v PT Kaltim Prima Coal and another [2011] EWHC 1842 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 143 (Jul)

A stay should be granted pursuant to s 9 of the Arbitration Act 1996 if the proceedings were “in respect of a matter which under the [arbitration] agreement is to be referred to arbitration”. In considering how that question was to be determined, the court should consider the substance of the controversy as it appeared from the circumstances in evidence on the application (and not just the particular terms in which the claimant had sought to formulate its claim in court).

It was also clear law that the construction of an arbitration agreement should start from the assumption that the parties, as rational business people, had been likely to have intended any dispute arising out of the relationship into which they had entered or purported to enter to be decided by the same tribunal. However, where there were multiple related agreements, the task of the court in determining whether a dispute fell within the jurisdiction clauses of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll