header-logo header-logo

01 August 2014 / Catriona Nicol , Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Assisted Dying Bill: time to reflect?

specialist_humanrights_nicol

The Assisted Dying Bill as currently drafted is highly unsatisfactory & in need of significant amendments, say Khawar Qureshi QC & Catriona Nicol

On 18 July 2014, the House of Lords debated the Assisted Dying Bill, which legalises physician-assisted dying for terminally-ill patients. The proposed change in the law has been met with criticism, both as a matter of principle and practice.

The Bill is the fifth dealing with assisted dying to come before Parliament in 10 years (with previous Bills (three introduced by Lord Joffe between 2004 and 2006 and one introduced by Lord Falconer in 2013) in substantially similar terms to the present Bill) having failed to become legislation). In 2006, Lord Joffe’s Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill was defeated following debate by 148 votes to 100.

Commission on Assisted Dying

The Commission on Assisted Dying (COAD) (a non-state body launched in 2010 with funding from Terry Pratchett and Bernard Lewis, patrons of Dignity in Dying) was set up to consider whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll