header-logo header-logo

Assisted Dying Bill: time to reflect?

01 August 2014 / Catriona Nicol , Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail
specialist_humanrights_nicol

The Assisted Dying Bill as currently drafted is highly unsatisfactory & in need of significant amendments, say Khawar Qureshi QC & Catriona Nicol

On 18 July 2014, the House of Lords debated the Assisted Dying Bill, which legalises physician-assisted dying for terminally-ill patients. The proposed change in the law has been met with criticism, both as a matter of principle and practice.

The Bill is the fifth dealing with assisted dying to come before Parliament in 10 years (with previous Bills (three introduced by Lord Joffe between 2004 and 2006 and one introduced by Lord Falconer in 2013) in substantially similar terms to the present Bill) having failed to become legislation). In 2006, Lord Joffe’s Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill was defeated following debate by 148 votes to 100.

Commission on Assisted Dying

The Commission on Assisted Dying (COAD) (a non-state body launched in 2010 with funding from Terry Pratchett and Bernard Lewis, patrons of Dignity in Dying) was set up to consider whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll