header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 August 2014 / Catriona Nicol , Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7617 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Assisted Dying Bill: time to reflect?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
specialist_humanrights_nicol

The Assisted Dying Bill as currently drafted is highly unsatisfactory & in need of significant amendments, say Khawar Qureshi QC & Catriona Nicol

On 18 July 2014, the House of Lords debated the Assisted Dying Bill, which legalises physician-assisted dying for terminally-ill patients. The proposed change in the law has been met with criticism, both as a matter of principle and practice.

The Bill is the fifth dealing with assisted dying to come before Parliament in 10 years (with previous Bills (three introduced by Lord Joffe between 2004 and 2006 and one introduced by Lord Falconer in 2013) in substantially similar terms to the present Bill) having failed to become legislation). In 2006, Lord Joffe’s Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill was defeated following debate by 148 votes to 100.

Commission on Assisted Dying

The Commission on Assisted Dying (COAD) (a non-state body launched in 2010 with funding from Terry Pratchett and Bernard Lewis, patrons of Dignity in Dying) was set up to consider whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll