header-logo header-logo

Autumn Statement: nothing for justice?

21 November 2022
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail
The justice budget suffered a ‘real terms cut’ in the Autumn Statement this week, lawyers have warned, despite Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s pledge to protect public services.

Hunt promised departmental spending would continue to grow but at a slower rate, with departments required to make efficiencies during a ‘challenging period’.

However, Law Society vice president Nick Emmerson said: ‘With inflation so high, the Ministry of Justice budget has effectively been cut.

‘There aren’t any more savings to be made in a justice system which is already breaking down after decades of underinvestment. The cost-of-living crisis and public spending cuts mean more and more people will need legal help with life-changing issues such as homelessness and debt. But who is going to give that vital advice if there aren’t enough solicitors to meet the current demand?

‘The government will be forced to pick up the pieces, at greater cost, further down the line.’

Mark Fenhalls KC, chair of the Bar, said: ‘While the Chancellor rightly recognises health and education as vital public services to be adequately funded, it is a mistake not to see justice in the same light.

‘The cost-of-living crisis means those most in need are now even more likely to require access to justice for help with housing, employment, debt and other essential legal issues. The justice sector was one of the hardest hit by austerity cuts a decade ago and was only just beginning to rebuild.

‘This real terms cut to justice funding could put us back at square one and that would be devastating for those most in need.’

Last week, the Bar Council published its report, 'Access denied: the state of the justice system in England and Wales in 2022', which painted a bleak picture of barristers leaving legal aid work due to low fees and workload pressures, crumbling, infested court buildings, and extra pressure on judges due to the rise in unrepresented litigants. 

Highlights of the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement include a freeze on inheritance tax, income tax and national insurance allowances and thresholds until 2028, a capital gains tax allowance cut to £6,000, and a reduction in the top income tax threshold from £150,000 to £125,000. Benefits and pensions will rise in line with inflation, while the minimum wage will rise nearly 10% to £10.42 per hour. The energy profits levy (windfall tax) will be increased to 35% and extended by two years, raising £14bn which will be used to cut business rates for about 700,000 businesses.

Issue: 8004 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll