header-logo header-logo

Back to school

istock_000004449971medium_4

Ian Smith returns from the summer break to swot up on the latest employment decisions

As the dog days of non-summer are upon us, the cases chosen for this update concern fairly short and precise employment law issues, which are no less interesting for that. They comprise yet another judicial pronouncement from the Court of Appeal on fiduciary duties in employment (or, to be more precise, the usual lack of them), two Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases on aspects of constructive dismissal and a decision of the Court of Session affirming the very narrow approach taken by the courts and tribunals to the power to strike out weak cases, where the comment will be made that this whole approach may be out of line with the legislative intentions of successive governments.

Fiduciary duties at work

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Ranson v Customer Systems Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 841 disapproved yet another attempt to expand the law so as to impose general fiduciary duties on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll