header-logo header-logo

Back to school

istock_000004449971medium_4

Ian Smith returns from the summer break to swot up on the latest employment decisions

As the dog days of non-summer are upon us, the cases chosen for this update concern fairly short and precise employment law issues, which are no less interesting for that. They comprise yet another judicial pronouncement from the Court of Appeal on fiduciary duties in employment (or, to be more precise, the usual lack of them), two Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) cases on aspects of constructive dismissal and a decision of the Court of Session affirming the very narrow approach taken by the courts and tribunals to the power to strike out weak cases, where the comment will be made that this whole approach may be out of line with the legislative intentions of successive governments.

Fiduciary duties at work

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Ranson v Customer Systems Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 841 disapproved yet another attempt to expand the law so as to impose general fiduciary duties on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll