header-logo header-logo

To ban or not to ban?

29 July 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan wades into the debate over referral fees

“I recommend that the payment of referral fees for personal injury claims be banned” (The final Jackson report, p 206). The payment of referral fees is “anti-competitive, a violation of privacy and a cartel against the consumer” (The Times, 27 June 2011).

During the 18 months between publication of these two statements a great deal happened and it appeared that referral fees would survive. It ain’t necessarily so.

I was told by a very senior civil servant in July 2010 that the new administration, while bent on drastic costs reform, was relaxed about referral fees. If solicitors wanted to spend their cash on buying work to do then let them.

Disappointment

May 2011 saw the publication of the Legal Services Board’s decision document on referral fees, referral arrangements and fee sharing. I was not alone in finding the report a disappointment. One of the largest insurers in the country

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll