header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

Bar chair savages legal aid cuts

Legal news update

Improperly designed legal aid schemes will take us back to a pre-Victorian era of two tier justice, Bar chairman Tim Dutton QC told the Institute of Barristers’ Clerks annual conference.

Arbitrary cost-cutting in family or criminal legal aid could lead to the most needy either not receiving representation or receiving representation of inadequate quality, he said.

“I can think of nothing more distasteful in a justice system than our finding that those who are wealthy are able to obtain better representation than those who are poor and facing family break-up or the risk of imprisonment.”

He also attacked best value tendering (BVT). “It will if brought in for Crown Court or family cases cause litigators and/or barristers to be bidding against each other to a monopoly purchaser of their services on a discounted one case one fee arrangement, or OCOF, or in family cases the even worse acronym Family One Case One Fee or ‘FOCOF’,” he said.

Dutton chairs a Bar Council working group which wants the rule prohibiting partnerships to be relaxed to allow barristers to form associations with solicitors, but not partnerships. “Partnerships conflict barristers out of acting against each other, can reduce competition in geographical areas, and could prevent the public from having access to a wide pool of advocates who can appear against each other,” he said.

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll