header-logo header-logo

Bar Council calls for Royal Commission of criminal justice

05 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The Bar Council has called for a ‘whole system review’ of criminal justice through a Royal Commission, in written evidence to the Public Accounts Committee’s inquiry into the backlog in the criminal courts

It warned a shortage of courts, judges, court staff and advocates is making it impossible to reduce the criminal cases backlog. There are currently more than 67,000 cases awaiting trial in the Crown Court, which makes the government’s target of 53,000 outstanding cases by March 2025 look precarious.

The bar set out the problems in the system at present and pinpointed nine areas for improvement. These were: early legal advice, early guilty pleas, prison transportation and interpretation services, remote hearings, judicial recruitment, community resolution, scheduling and listing, support for legal aid professionals, and targeted assistance for specific areas and court centres.

Its submission last week highlighted that judicial sitting days are at maximum levels, having reached 107,700 sitting days, and it may be difficult to find enough judges to hear the backlog of cases.

It states: ‘Between 2012-13 and 2021-22, the number of judges (full time employed) in England and Wales has fallen by 4% and the number of magistrates in the same period by 47%.

‘This is not simply a response to declining caseloads; judicial capacity has fallen more steeply than the number of cases in the respective courts in which they operate. Perhaps of even greater impact is the loss of advocates (particularly barristers) available to prosecute and defend the serious criminal cases that are heard in the Crown Court. Between 2019-20 and 2020-21 the number of barristers practising full-time in publicly funded criminal law declined by more than 10%.’

Bar Council chair Sam Townend KC (pictured) said: ‘Existing criminal justice policy is now at a dead end and substantial change and investment are needed to reduce the backlog.

‘The status quo has a detrimental impact on victims, attrition of witnesses, and innocent defendants are left for years languishing with the charges oppressively held over their heads. The guilty are not being dealt with and the public has lost confidence in a system that is just not working.’

Issue: 8074 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll