header-logo header-logo

Bar hits out at Brexit plans

18 July 2018
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Legal services
printer mail-detail

White Paper risks endangering access to justice for UK clients, lawyers warn

The ‘disappointing’ Brexit White Paper could lead to a scenario where lawyers on EU soil lose their right to advise on EU law or even on UK law, the Bar Council has warned.

This would leave UK businesses unable to rely on their usual UK lawyers and forced to hire lawyers from the EU instead. Meanwhile, barristers from England and Wales would be unable to defend the UK government, UK businesses or UK citizens in any proceedings before the European Court of Justice.

In its hard-hitting response to last week’s White Paper, the Bar Council further warned that the UK professions would be left in the margins, making it harder for them to maintain or extend their market share. Consequently, the UK risked losing not only the tax revenue but also the influence and ‘soft power’ generated by the legal services sector in Europe and internationally.

The Bar Council stated: ‘Unless the government can explain how a binding EU-wide regulatory framework for legal services could be agreed in an FTA context, the legal professions in the UK would be left to negotiate different bilateral agreements (at a political and/or bar association level) covering the provision of legal services with many of the other 27 (or 30, including EEA) member states.

‘Even if successful, this would provide only a patchwork of rights and obligations, varying from country to country. All this will take many years, if it can be accomplished at all, and in the meantime UK clients will face additional difficulties and cost in ensuring access to justice in their dealings with the EU/EEA.’

Four amendments by pro-Brexit MPs to the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Bill have succeeded in the Commons, watering down the White Paper’s proposals. They include that the UK is prevented from collecting tariffs on behalf of the EU unless there is a reciprocal arrangement, and that it be prevented from joining the EU’s VAT regime.

Aline Doussin, a London-based trade partner in the Hogan Lovells Brexit Taskforce, advised businesses to plan for ‘full implementation of the Union Customs Code, and take full advantage of the available trusted trader schemes for trades with the EU27. In parallel, the impact of the withdrawal of the UK from the EU internal market on services should be carefully reviewed and planned for, for all traders of services, not just financial ones’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll