header-logo header-logo

Bar Professional Training Course could be split

02 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Training for barristers could be split into two parts under proposals to shake up the Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) to make entry to the Bar more affordable.

The Bar Council and Council of the Inns of Court have proposed that the 30-week BPTC, which costs £15,000-£19,000, no longer be compulsory. Instead, the BPTC would be split into: part one, knowledge-based subjects, namely civil and criminal procedure and evidence; and part two, skills such as drafting, advocacy and conferencing.

Students would be able to prepare for part one exams “by any method they think fit or can afford”, including private study. If they passed part one, they would be allowed to move on to part two, which would require formal attendance on a BPTC course.

The proposal is made in an addendum to the Bar Standards Board’s October 2016 consultation paper, The future of training for the Bar. Interested parties have until 31 January 2017 to respond.

In support of their proposal, the Council and Bar Council say: “The Inns and the Bar Council have a genuine fear, based on their direct contacts with school-leavers, university students and the Inns’ own student members, that the Bar is becoming a profession for the social ‘haves’ which excludes the ‘have nots.’”

They make the point that the BPTC has a high risk of failure. Of the 2012/13 students, 30 months after completing the taught course, 15% had failed and 7% had exams outstanding. The self-employed and employed Bar appoint just over 400 pupils per year, and a student who passes the course with a “competent” rating (rather than “outstanding” or “very competent”) has a one in 20 chance of obtaining pupillage.

They argue that splitting the course would reduce the overall costs for students and act as an early warning signal to students unlikely to do well.

However, Helen Hudson, head of legal development at Nottingham Law School (part of Nottingham Trent University), said: “The proposals appear to divorce the key elements required for effective practice. The integration of the various elements of practical legal skills is essential if we are to produce effective practitioners.”

Issue: 7726 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
back-to-top-scroll