header-logo header-logo

Bar slaps down “super-quango”

27 November 2014
Issue: 7632 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Chairman of Bar Council: single regulator is “last thing we need”

Nicholas Lavender QC, chairman of the Bar Council, has mounted a staunch defence ahead of any plans to introduce a single regulator “super-quango”.

In a speech to regulators and professionals at Lincoln’s Inn this week, he warned that constantly changing the regulatory regime for legal services is costly and lawyers need time to let the current regime bed in.

On the possibility of a single regulator being introduced—the Legal Services Board (LSB) controversially called for a single legal services regulator in 2013—Lavender warned that a super-quango would fail to understand the differences between the various parts of the legal profession and would try to impose a one-size-fits-all concept of regulation.

“The last thing we need in this country, and certainly in the legal profession, is more or bigger quangos,” he said.

“I trust that no-one in this room would consider it appropriate for lawyers to be regulated directly by a government minister. Likewise, it would be unsatisfactory for lawyers to be regulated by a government minister’s agents or appointees.

“So that is another reason why it would be an inappropriate and retrograde step to set up an new quango, or series of quangos, to regulate, say advocates, and litigators, and conveyancers, and what have you. And establishing a super-quango, with the attendant bureaucracy, would be a backwards step because it would be likely to lead to regulation which was both more expensive and of poorer quality.

“We need a regulatory system which respects the independence of lawyers and of the legal professions. One of the important safeguards of the rule of law is the existence of an independent legal profession or professions.”

Lavender also took aim at the concept of entity-based regulation, which would not work in the area of advocacy and was “simply a fashionable idea amongst regulators”.

Meanwhile, lawyers are still getting to grips with the Legal Services Act 2007 and the regulatory regime it introduced. Moreover, the LSB, Bar Standards Board and Solicitors Regulation Authority will all have acquired new heads in the space of eight months, adding to the changes.

Issue: 7632 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll