header-logo header-logo

18 April 2025 / Barbara Mills KC
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Opinion , Career focus , Health & safety , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Being well at the Bar

216138
Now is the time to take a proactive approach to barristers’ wellbeing, rather than waiting for things to go wrong: Barbara Mills KC sets out the case for better support

The Bar Council is the representative voice of the profession in England and Wales, and we have 18,000 members comprised of self-employed and employed barristers. When I became chair of the Bar in January, I pledged to prioritise barristers’ mental health and wellbeing this year.

Psychological wellbeing within the profession is rarely spoken about, and yet our ‘Wellbeing at the Bar’ report 2024 highlighted that 23.7% of barristers who responded to our survey reported low psychological wellbeing, and 31.4% of respondents indicated they weren’t coping. The Bar Council seeks to address and support the wellbeing challenges faced in the profession.

Women, barristers from an ethnic minority background, younger and more junior barristers all reported lower levels of wellbeing compared to their colleagues. Further, there are particular challenges in certain practice areas. Barristers working in criminal and family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll