header-logo header-logo

Being well at the Bar

18 April 2025 / Barbara Mills KC
Issue: 8113 / Categories: Opinion , Career focus , Health & safety , Profession , Mental health
printer mail-detail
216138
Now is the time to take a proactive approach to barristers’ wellbeing, rather than waiting for things to go wrong: Barbara Mills KC sets out the case for better support

The Bar Council is the representative voice of the profession in England and Wales, and we have 18,000 members comprised of self-employed and employed barristers. When I became chair of the Bar in January, I pledged to prioritise barristers’ mental health and wellbeing this year.

Psychological wellbeing within the profession is rarely spoken about, and yet our ‘Wellbeing at the Bar’ report 2024 highlighted that 23.7% of barristers who responded to our survey reported low psychological wellbeing, and 31.4% of respondents indicated they weren’t coping. The Bar Council seeks to address and support the wellbeing challenges faced in the profession.

Women, barristers from an ethnic minority background, younger and more junior barristers all reported lower levels of wellbeing compared to their colleagues. Further, there are particular challenges in certain practice areas. Barristers working in criminal and family

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll