header-logo header-logo

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Bellwether report: small is beautiful

Small firms are luring solicitors away from Big Law in increasing numbers, according to the latest Bellwether report.

The report, ‘Is the Future Small?’, published this week by LexisNexis UK, reveals a thriving small law firm sector with a bright future. The percentage of solicitors at small firms who previously worked at medium to top tier practices has risen from 53% in 2016 to 64% in 2019.

Currently, small law firms make up the bulk of the legal market, with 95% of firms earning less than £500,000 and 50% earning less than £150,000.

Nine out of ten solicitors surveyed for the report said the benefits of working in a small firm tend to be generally ‘advantageous’, citing the ability to remain in control (82%), a better client experience (79%), and swift decision making (76%) as the main draws.

Fewer than one in five want to work for a large firm. The rest were fairly evenly split between preferring a small or solo outfit (fewer than 20 fee earners) and a medium-sized firm for their next role.

Small is not always beautiful, however. Three-quarters of those surveyed felt some clients could perceive small firms as lacking in credibility, while 82% of solicitors in small firms worry that a lack of capacity could force them to turn good work away. One quarter of solicitors worried it may be difficult to build a pipeline of future business at a small firm. Other issues cited include that it’s hard to succession plan as clients choose the individual solicitor personally, and increasing compliance regulations.

The research was gathered through eight in-depth interviews with lawyers in small firms and online surveys completed by 176 solicitors.

Jon Whittle, market development director, LexisNexis UK, said: ‘The future is certainly bright for small firms and an overwhelming number of solicitors working in these organisations believe that small law is better―from both personal and professional standpoints.

‘While small law firms believe the benefits of their size outweigh the challenges, these organisations aren’t dismissive of the challenges they face, which is a good thing. Their combination of realism, confidence and optimism will likely help them to continue to thrive.’  

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll