header-logo header-logo

Bellwether report: small is beautiful

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Small firms are luring solicitors away from Big Law in increasing numbers, according to the latest Bellwether report.

The report, ‘Is the Future Small?’, published this week by LexisNexis UK, reveals a thriving small law firm sector with a bright future. The percentage of solicitors at small firms who previously worked at medium to top tier practices has risen from 53% in 2016 to 64% in 2019.

Currently, small law firms make up the bulk of the legal market, with 95% of firms earning less than £500,000 and 50% earning less than £150,000.

Nine out of ten solicitors surveyed for the report said the benefits of working in a small firm tend to be generally ‘advantageous’, citing the ability to remain in control (82%), a better client experience (79%), and swift decision making (76%) as the main draws.

Fewer than one in five want to work for a large firm. The rest were fairly evenly split between preferring a small or solo outfit (fewer than 20 fee earners) and a medium-sized firm for their next role.

Small is not always beautiful, however. Three-quarters of those surveyed felt some clients could perceive small firms as lacking in credibility, while 82% of solicitors in small firms worry that a lack of capacity could force them to turn good work away. One quarter of solicitors worried it may be difficult to build a pipeline of future business at a small firm. Other issues cited include that it’s hard to succession plan as clients choose the individual solicitor personally, and increasing compliance regulations.

The research was gathered through eight in-depth interviews with lawyers in small firms and online surveys completed by 176 solicitors.

Jon Whittle, market development director, LexisNexis UK, said: ‘The future is certainly bright for small firms and an overwhelming number of solicitors working in these organisations believe that small law is better―from both personal and professional standpoints.

‘While small law firms believe the benefits of their size outweigh the challenges, these organisations aren’t dismissive of the challenges they face, which is a good thing. Their combination of realism, confidence and optimism will likely help them to continue to thrive.’  

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll