header-logo header-logo

Bellwether report: small is beautiful

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Small firms are luring solicitors away from Big Law in increasing numbers, according to the latest Bellwether report.

The report, ‘Is the Future Small?’, published this week by LexisNexis UK, reveals a thriving small law firm sector with a bright future. The percentage of solicitors at small firms who previously worked at medium to top tier practices has risen from 53% in 2016 to 64% in 2019.

Currently, small law firms make up the bulk of the legal market, with 95% of firms earning less than £500,000 and 50% earning less than £150,000.

Nine out of ten solicitors surveyed for the report said the benefits of working in a small firm tend to be generally ‘advantageous’, citing the ability to remain in control (82%), a better client experience (79%), and swift decision making (76%) as the main draws.

Fewer than one in five want to work for a large firm. The rest were fairly evenly split between preferring a small or solo outfit (fewer than 20 fee earners) and a medium-sized firm for their next role.

Small is not always beautiful, however. Three-quarters of those surveyed felt some clients could perceive small firms as lacking in credibility, while 82% of solicitors in small firms worry that a lack of capacity could force them to turn good work away. One quarter of solicitors worried it may be difficult to build a pipeline of future business at a small firm. Other issues cited include that it’s hard to succession plan as clients choose the individual solicitor personally, and increasing compliance regulations.

The research was gathered through eight in-depth interviews with lawyers in small firms and online surveys completed by 176 solicitors.

Jon Whittle, market development director, LexisNexis UK, said: ‘The future is certainly bright for small firms and an overwhelming number of solicitors working in these organisations believe that small law is better―from both personal and professional standpoints.

‘While small law firms believe the benefits of their size outweigh the challenges, these organisations aren’t dismissive of the challenges they face, which is a good thing. Their combination of realism, confidence and optimism will likely help them to continue to thrive.’  

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll