header-logo header-logo

Bellwether report: small is beautiful

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-detail
Small firms are luring solicitors away from Big Law in increasing numbers, according to the latest Bellwether report.

The report, ‘Is the Future Small?’, published this week by LexisNexis UK, reveals a thriving small law firm sector with a bright future. The percentage of solicitors at small firms who previously worked at medium to top tier practices has risen from 53% in 2016 to 64% in 2019.

Currently, small law firms make up the bulk of the legal market, with 95% of firms earning less than £500,000 and 50% earning less than £150,000.

Nine out of ten solicitors surveyed for the report said the benefits of working in a small firm tend to be generally ‘advantageous’, citing the ability to remain in control (82%), a better client experience (79%), and swift decision making (76%) as the main draws.

Fewer than one in five want to work for a large firm. The rest were fairly evenly split between preferring a small or solo outfit (fewer than 20 fee earners) and a medium-sized firm for their next role.

Small is not always beautiful, however. Three-quarters of those surveyed felt some clients could perceive small firms as lacking in credibility, while 82% of solicitors in small firms worry that a lack of capacity could force them to turn good work away. One quarter of solicitors worried it may be difficult to build a pipeline of future business at a small firm. Other issues cited include that it’s hard to succession plan as clients choose the individual solicitor personally, and increasing compliance regulations.

The research was gathered through eight in-depth interviews with lawyers in small firms and online surveys completed by 176 solicitors.

Jon Whittle, market development director, LexisNexis UK, said: ‘The future is certainly bright for small firms and an overwhelming number of solicitors working in these organisations believe that small law is better―from both personal and professional standpoints.

‘While small law firms believe the benefits of their size outweigh the challenges, these organisations aren’t dismissive of the challenges they face, which is a good thing. Their combination of realism, confidence and optimism will likely help them to continue to thrive.’  

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll