For the best?

Let’s face it—human nature dictates that inter-family disputes or disagreements between family members and the court appointed decision-maker—are just part of the daily grind of a professional deputy. If a local authority is involved, then add in a liberal sprinkling of resource agendas and service provision goals. As the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) Code of Practice obliges us to always act in our client’s best interests, we are consequently duty bound to tease out and weigh up this jumble of competing evidence and heavily-charged views. Sometimes the best we can hope for is a complicated and arduous journey to reach that “best interests” decision—at worst we find ourselves embroiled in entrenched stalemate.

The right approach?

Now it’s true that the Code of Practice contains numerous suggestions on how