header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / Rosamund Rhodes-kemp
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Child law , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A better way?

Rosamund Rhodes-Kemp explains how children’s negligence claims could be better managed

The issue of how children’s clinical negligence claims can be handled to best effect remains uncertain, particlularly in the wake of the government’s recent green paper on the future of legal aid funding. In the main these claims relate to still births and catastrophic brain injury. In both instances the effect on the family is devastating.

First steps

These cases are taking too long to resolve, which is detrimental to both the families concerned and the public purse, yet experts and stakeholders agree that making small improvements in each stage of the claims process should be possible and could cumulatively make a big difference to the outcome in terms of time and cost.

Feedback from our recent conference, Claims Involving Children—How Could We Do It Better? showed that the starting point should be earlier letters of claim as this would give defendants a better opportunity to investigate and respond fully. Consideration at the outset as to what format is going to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll