header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / Rosamund Rhodes-kemp
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Child law , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A better way?

Rosamund Rhodes-Kemp explains how children’s negligence claims could be better managed

The issue of how children’s clinical negligence claims can be handled to best effect remains uncertain, particlularly in the wake of the government’s recent green paper on the future of legal aid funding. In the main these claims relate to still births and catastrophic brain injury. In both instances the effect on the family is devastating.

First steps

These cases are taking too long to resolve, which is detrimental to both the families concerned and the public purse, yet experts and stakeholders agree that making small improvements in each stage of the claims process should be possible and could cumulatively make a big difference to the outcome in terms of time and cost.

Feedback from our recent conference, Claims Involving Children—How Could We Do It Better? showed that the starting point should be earlier letters of claim as this would give defendants a better opportunity to investigate and respond fully. Consideration at the outset as to what format is going to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll