header-logo header-logo

The big squeeze

04 March 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7689 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
001_nlj_7689_pigott

New exit payments impact public sector terms & conditions, says Charles Pigott

In 2014 the coalition government consulted on new requirements for higher paid workers to re-pay their termination payments on a sliding scale if they returned to the public sector in any capacity within a year. That led to the passing of ss 154 to 157 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015.

Since the last election, the Conservative government has moved to impose an overall cap on the value of public sector exit payments, which would in some cases override contractual entitlements, as well as limiting ex-gratia payments. The necessary enabling legislation is contained in the Enterprise Bill 2015, currently going through Parliament.

Finally, the government launched a consultation in early February 2016 about changing the underlying terms and conditions regarding these payments, to make them less generous and more consistent across the whole public sector.

The new claw-back rules

Final draft regulations—which will become The Repayment of Public Sector Exit Payments Regulations 2016—were published at the end of last

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll