header-logo header-logo

04 March 2016 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7689 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The big squeeze

001_nlj_7689_pigott

New exit payments impact public sector terms & conditions, says Charles Pigott

In 2014 the coalition government consulted on new requirements for higher paid workers to re-pay their termination payments on a sliding scale if they returned to the public sector in any capacity within a year. That led to the passing of ss 154 to 157 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015.

Since the last election, the Conservative government has moved to impose an overall cap on the value of public sector exit payments, which would in some cases override contractual entitlements, as well as limiting ex-gratia payments. The necessary enabling legislation is contained in the Enterprise Bill 2015, currently going through Parliament.

Finally, the government launched a consultation in early February 2016 about changing the underlying terms and conditions regarding these payments, to make them less generous and more consistent across the whole public sector.

The new claw-back rules

Final draft regulations—which will become The Repayment of Public Sector Exit Payments Regulations 2016—were published at the end of last

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll