header-logo header-logo

08 July 2022 / Laura Rees
Issue: 7986 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Bill of costs: appeal dismissed!

87142
Fee earners could risk failing to have their bills assessed if the right fee earner information is not provided, says Laura Rees
  • Court of Appeal judgment in AKC v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWCA Civ 630 is a blow to firms who use a team approach and have multiple fee earners conducting a case.
  • Bills must be drafted with all the requisite fee earner information.
  • Those that draft bills must have a deep understanding of the functionality of how a bill works, as leaving codes/details blank may mean that the summary sheets within the bill are unreliable.

Lord Justice Newey provided the leading judgment in AKC v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWCA Civ 630, dismissing the claimant’s appeal and concluding that the claimant must provide more information in relation to the fee earner’s SCCO grade and status in both paper and electronic bills.

The claimant made a clinical negligence claim against the defendant in respect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll