header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / James Naylor , Claire Southway
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

A binding agreement?

How can landlords guarantee they receive rent payments when insolvency looms? James Naylor & Claire Southway investigate

Can a landlord have its cake and eat it? Or, in the case of Cotswold Company Limited subnom Threadneedle Pensions Ltd v Asher Miller [2009] EWHC 1151 (Ch), can a landlord make a claim under a company voluntary arrangement for future rent, irrespective of an express surrender ending the tenant’s leasehold rights and the right to occupy and use the premises?

The Cotswold Company Limited (the company) was a tenant of retail premises pursuant to a lease (the lease) of 15 years from 7 March 2003 at an initial rent of £100,000 per annum. The lease imposed standard obligations on the company to pay rent and service charge and to keep the premises in repair during and at the end of the term.

On 21 December 2006, the company put forward proposals for a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) under Pt I of the Insolvency Act 1986. By this point the company had vacated the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll