header-logo header-logo

10 July 2009 / James Naylor , Claire Southway
Issue: 7377 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

A binding agreement?

How can landlords guarantee they receive rent payments when insolvency looms? James Naylor & Claire Southway investigate

Can a landlord have its cake and eat it? Or, in the case of Cotswold Company Limited subnom Threadneedle Pensions Ltd v Asher Miller [2009] EWHC 1151 (Ch), can a landlord make a claim under a company voluntary arrangement for future rent, irrespective of an express surrender ending the tenant’s leasehold rights and the right to occupy and use the premises?

The Cotswold Company Limited (the company) was a tenant of retail premises pursuant to a lease (the lease) of 15 years from 7 March 2003 at an initial rent of £100,000 per annum. The lease imposed standard obligations on the company to pay rent and service charge and to keep the premises in repair during and at the end of the term.

On 21 December 2006, the company put forward proposals for a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) under Pt I of the Insolvency Act 1986. By this point the company had vacated the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll