header-logo header-logo

Born survivors

17 April 2014 / Nicholas Lavender KC
Issue: 7603 / Categories: Bar Council , Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Despite budget cuts & slashed fees, the Bar will survive & prosper, says Nicholas Lavender QC

Heraclitus taught that everything is in flux, and 2,500 years of history have not proved him wrong. Change is constant, in legal services as elsewhere, and not always for the better. It is as tempting for a lawyer, as for anyone else, to follow Lord Salisbury’s example and ask: “Change? Aren’t things bad enough already?”

For many at the Bar, the direction of change is positive. Looked at as a whole, the Bar is growing and prospering. However, the picture is markedly different for different sectors of the Bar. At one end of the spectrum, many specialist civil practitioners are busier than ever. At the other end, criminal barristers have endured year after year of fee cuts and now face the package of proposals which are euphemistically called Transforming Legal Aid, as well as awaiting the imminent report by Sir Bill Jeffrey on the market for criminal advocacy services.

Meanwhile, clients who cannot afford to fund

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll