header-logo header-logo

09 May 2017
Issue: 7745 / Categories: Features , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit: Is the UK set for WTO limbo?

Gregory Shaffer explains the UK’s WTO commitments after EU withdrawal

The idea of World Trade Organization (WTO) vetoes being used to settle historical scores over Gibraltar or the Falklands has been circulated as one post-Brexit complication, with the UK set to relinquish its existing WTO status as part of the EU bloc. Gregory Shaffer, a leading authority on international trade law, explains the UK's tariff and other WTO commitments and considers the very real prospect of the UK spending some time in WTO limbo.

What is the background to this? Could certain countries block the UK’s efforts for a new WTO settlement?

The UK is an original member of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and its successor organisation the WTO. However, only the EU represents and speaks for EU member states in the WTO—the UK’s rights and obligations under the WTO are defined as a result of negotiations conducted by the EU for all EU member states. After Brexit, the UK will need to have its own schedules

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll