header-logo header-logo

Brexit worst case scenario

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Law Society launches guidance papers outlining no deal risks

Prime minister Theresa May struggled to rally the Cabinet and MPs around a draft deal this week, as solicitors turned to professional guidance for advice on minimising the risks of a no deal Brexit.

The Law Society launched the first four guidance papers in a series last week, explaining the risks no deal presents for the provision of legal services in the EU, civil and commercial disputes, data and family law.

For example, the Brussels II Regulation helps families resolve disputes about divorce and child custody where parties live in more than one EU state. Under the regulation, EU courts automatically recognise judgments on matrimonial and parental responsibility.

However, Brussels II will no longer apply once Britain leaves the EU. Neither will the Maintenance Regulation, which helps ensure the payment of maintenance in cross border situations.

On financial disputes between businesses and individuals, Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said: ‘There are currently no international conventions that can be used to help and the result is that the enforcement of these judgments will depend on the national law or the possibility of relying on old bilateral conventions from the 1920s or 1930s.

‘Furthermore, it’s not clear, for example, what will happen with ongoing cases if we exit the EU without a deal. Our presumption is that as there is no reciprocity and no agreement on ongoing cases, even the judgments from these cases are not enforceable under the reciprocal EU rules.’

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: ‘The government has published a series of “technical papers” which set out the consequences of our departure from the EU without a negotiated agreement in various areas including civil justice co-operation. 

‘The Law Society has followed that lead with papers that address issues arising in practice for solicitors. The Law Society on behalf of the profession has made it clear that a no deal exit would be disastrous.

‘It is difficult to predict exactly the effect but the Law Society’s papers address the major issues that will arise so that solicitors address and prepare for those in case a deal is not done.’

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll