header-logo header-logo

Brexit worst case scenario

14 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Law Society launches guidance papers outlining no deal risks

Prime minister Theresa May struggled to rally the Cabinet and MPs around a draft deal this week, as solicitors turned to professional guidance for advice on minimising the risks of a no deal Brexit.

The Law Society launched the first four guidance papers in a series last week, explaining the risks no deal presents for the provision of legal services in the EU, civil and commercial disputes, data and family law.

For example, the Brussels II Regulation helps families resolve disputes about divorce and child custody where parties live in more than one EU state. Under the regulation, EU courts automatically recognise judgments on matrimonial and parental responsibility.

However, Brussels II will no longer apply once Britain leaves the EU. Neither will the Maintenance Regulation, which helps ensure the payment of maintenance in cross border situations.

On financial disputes between businesses and individuals, Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said: ‘There are currently no international conventions that can be used to help and the result is that the enforcement of these judgments will depend on the national law or the possibility of relying on old bilateral conventions from the 1920s or 1930s.

‘Furthermore, it’s not clear, for example, what will happen with ongoing cases if we exit the EU without a deal. Our presumption is that as there is no reciprocity and no agreement on ongoing cases, even the judgments from these cases are not enforceable under the reciprocal EU rules.’

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: ‘The government has published a series of “technical papers” which set out the consequences of our departure from the EU without a negotiated agreement in various areas including civil justice co-operation. 

‘The Law Society has followed that lead with papers that address issues arising in practice for solicitors. The Law Society on behalf of the profession has made it clear that a no deal exit would be disastrous.

‘It is difficult to predict exactly the effect but the Law Society’s papers address the major issues that will arise so that solicitors address and prepare for those in case a deal is not done.’

Issue: 7817 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll