header-logo header-logo

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Employment , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

Budget 2024: NICs rise & non-doms go

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has abolished non-doms and raised national insurance for medium and large employers in a dramatic budget that aims to raise an extra £40bn in taxes

Current tax rules for non-UK domiciled individuals will end on 6 April, replaced by a system based on tax residence. Employers’ national insurance contributions (NIC) go up by 1.2% to 15% from April, and the threshold will be reduced from £9,100 to £5,000, raising £25bn per year. However, 865,000 small employers will not pay any NICs at all as the allowance is rising from £5,000 to £10,500.

Nicky Owen, head of professional practices, Crowe UK, said: ‘One upshot of the increase in employers’ NICs is that LLP structures have instantly become more attractive. Professional practice firms may want to relook at their salaried partners and consider whether it is time to promote them to fully fledged partners.’

Reeves gave an extra £5bn for housebuilding. Stamp duty land tax for second homes rises from 3% to 5%. Jonathan Achampong, head of residential property, Howard Kennedy, said the increase ‘has come as a bit of a surprise to the residential property market and will, no doubt, lead to some frantic activity to get deals over the line this evening.

‘Over the coming days and weeks, potential buyers and investors are likely to seek to renegotiate purchase prices to factor in this additional cost, and we may also see some downward pressure exerted on sale prices over the coming months.’

Reeves vowed to ‘invest, invest, invest’ and promised ‘no return to austerity’, with an extra £5bn for 1.5 million new homes, £6.7bn for education and £22.6bn (daily spend) and £3.1bn (capital) for the NHS.

The Ministry of Justice budget rises 5.6% to £13.8bn in 2025-26, with funding for the Law Officers’ Department, which finances criminal prosecution services, rising 7.5% to £1.1bn.

Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, welcomed the ‘much-needed real terms increases’ but said justice would need ‘sustained funding through next spring’s spending review to move away from crisis mode’.

Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Employment , Public , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll