header-logo header-logo

Budget 2024: NICs rise & non-doms go

30 October 2024
Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Employment , Public , Property
printer mail-detail
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has abolished non-doms and raised national insurance for medium and large employers in a dramatic budget that aims to raise an extra £40bn in taxes

Current tax rules for non-UK domiciled individuals will end on 6 April, replaced by a system based on tax residence. Employers’ national insurance contributions (NIC) go up by 1.2% to 15% from April, and the threshold will be reduced from £9,100 to £5,000, raising £25bn per year. However, 865,000 small employers will not pay any NICs at all as the allowance is rising from £5,000 to £10,500.

Nicky Owen, head of professional practices, Crowe UK, said: ‘One upshot of the increase in employers’ NICs is that LLP structures have instantly become more attractive. Professional practice firms may want to relook at their salaried partners and consider whether it is time to promote them to fully fledged partners.’

Reeves gave an extra £5bn for housebuilding. Stamp duty land tax for second homes rises from 3% to 5%. Jonathan Achampong, head of residential property, Howard Kennedy, said the increase ‘has come as a bit of a surprise to the residential property market and will, no doubt, lead to some frantic activity to get deals over the line this evening.

‘Over the coming days and weeks, potential buyers and investors are likely to seek to renegotiate purchase prices to factor in this additional cost, and we may also see some downward pressure exerted on sale prices over the coming months.’

Reeves vowed to ‘invest, invest, invest’ and promised ‘no return to austerity’, with an extra £5bn for 1.5 million new homes, £6.7bn for education and £22.6bn (daily spend) and £3.1bn (capital) for the NHS.

The Ministry of Justice budget rises 5.6% to £13.8bn in 2025-26, with funding for the Law Officers’ Department, which finances criminal prosecution services, rising 7.5% to £1.1bn.

Sam Townend KC, chair of the Bar Council, welcomed the ‘much-needed real terms increases’ but said justice would need ‘sustained funding through next spring’s spending review to move away from crisis mode’.

Issue: 8092 / Categories: Legal News , Tax , Employment , Public , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll