header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Call for national legal support fund

Solicitors to pay in dormant funds & City firms to sponsor major initiatives

Levies on payday loan companies and financial penalties on government contractors for faulty social security assessments could be used to fund legal advice centres, an influential think-tank has proposed.

The Low Commission, established by the Legal Action Group last October to develop a strategy for the future provision of social welfare law when the next government is formed in 2015, has collected the views of more than 230 individuals and organisations.

Its draft report estimates  that “there is about £400m per year available to fund advice and legal support services – mainly coming from local authorities, the Money Advice Service and the legal aid that remains for social welfare law”, and that a further £100m is needed each year to ensure basic provision.
It advocates the creation of a national advice and legal support fund of £50m per year for 10 years to fund advice and legal support work. Funds would be drawn from central government, with 90% of the money going to local authorities and the remainder for national initiatives.

To help finance this, and to promote good decision making, government contractors could be penalised on a “polluter pays” principle for decisions that are later overturned. The other £50m would come from statutory, voluntary and commercial bodies. The report suggests, for example, that the Financial Conduct Authority impose a levy on payday loan companies, while solicitors pay in any dormant funds relating to dissolved companies and unclaimed damages in collective actions, and City law firms sponsor national initiatives.
 

However, it says millions of pounds could be saved if public services bodies got decisions right in the first place, for example, 35% of the 340,000 welfare benefits appeals in 2011-2012, which cost £66m, were upheld.
Its other recommendations include a national legal helpline and more support for Mackenzie Friends. The Commission, chaired by Lord Colin Low, is asking for responses to its proposals by the end of this month, and will publish its final report in December.

Issue: 7574 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll