header-logo header-logo

11 May 2018
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Centre for Women’s Justice: lawyers needed to help with research

A major research project is being launched into the way the justice system treats women who kill abusive men.

Criminal lawyers, both prosecution and defence, are invited to contribute to the study, which is being run by the Centre for Women’s Justice and Justice for Women. They can take part by completing a survey on the topic by 17 June, at: www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/CWJresearch.

Both defence and prosecution solicitors and barristers, whether or not they have acted in murder cases, are invited to complete the questionnaire and pass it on to their colleagues. The researchers are especially keen to interview in more detail lawyers who have acted in cases where a woman has killed their male ex-partner.

The study will involve interviews with legal teams, professionals and women survivors and their families. Its goals include identifying barriers to women obtaining justice, identifying potential reforms, and reporting on the experiences of women on trial. It will also consider whether and what training and guidance should be provided to advocates in this area.

It will explore the experiences of women such as Sally Challen, convicted in 2011 of murdering her estranged husband, Richard, with a hammer. At trial, with no visible signs of injury to show she was a domestic abuse victim, she was depicted as motivated by jealousy and sentenced to 22 years, later reduced to 18 years.

Her claim of diminished responsibility on the basis of 40 years of abusive, humiliating, degrading and controlling behaviour was unsuccessful. Her husband used sexual violence and humiliation to control her, isolated her, and would taunt her with his infidelities and convince her she could not trust her own sanity.

In March, however, Sally and her legal team won the right to appeal her conviction on the grounds of fresh evidence in the form of increased understanding of coercive control.

For more information, contact Nic Mainwood at n.mainwood@centreforwomensjustice.org.uk or phone 07903 912641.

Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll