header-logo header-logo

11 May 2018
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Centre for Women’s Justice: lawyers needed to help with research

A major research project is being launched into the way the justice system treats women who kill abusive men.

Criminal lawyers, both prosecution and defence, are invited to contribute to the study, which is being run by the Centre for Women’s Justice and Justice for Women. They can take part by completing a survey on the topic by 17 June, at: www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/CWJresearch.

Both defence and prosecution solicitors and barristers, whether or not they have acted in murder cases, are invited to complete the questionnaire and pass it on to their colleagues. The researchers are especially keen to interview in more detail lawyers who have acted in cases where a woman has killed their male ex-partner.

The study will involve interviews with legal teams, professionals and women survivors and their families. Its goals include identifying barriers to women obtaining justice, identifying potential reforms, and reporting on the experiences of women on trial. It will also consider whether and what training and guidance should be provided to advocates in this area.

It will explore the experiences of women such as Sally Challen, convicted in 2011 of murdering her estranged husband, Richard, with a hammer. At trial, with no visible signs of injury to show she was a domestic abuse victim, she was depicted as motivated by jealousy and sentenced to 22 years, later reduced to 18 years.

Her claim of diminished responsibility on the basis of 40 years of abusive, humiliating, degrading and controlling behaviour was unsuccessful. Her husband used sexual violence and humiliation to control her, isolated her, and would taunt her with his infidelities and convince her she could not trust her own sanity.

In March, however, Sally and her legal team won the right to appeal her conviction on the grounds of fresh evidence in the form of increased understanding of coercive control.

For more information, contact Nic Mainwood at n.mainwood@centreforwomensjustice.org.uk or phone 07903 912641.

Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll