header-logo header-logo

Centre for Women’s Justice: lawyers needed to help with research

11 May 2018
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A major research project is being launched into the way the justice system treats women who kill abusive men.

Criminal lawyers, both prosecution and defence, are invited to contribute to the study, which is being run by the Centre for Women’s Justice and Justice for Women. They can take part by completing a survey on the topic by 17 June, at: www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/CWJresearch.

Both defence and prosecution solicitors and barristers, whether or not they have acted in murder cases, are invited to complete the questionnaire and pass it on to their colleagues. The researchers are especially keen to interview in more detail lawyers who have acted in cases where a woman has killed their male ex-partner.

The study will involve interviews with legal teams, professionals and women survivors and their families. Its goals include identifying barriers to women obtaining justice, identifying potential reforms, and reporting on the experiences of women on trial. It will also consider whether and what training and guidance should be provided to advocates in this area.

It will explore the experiences of women such as Sally Challen, convicted in 2011 of murdering her estranged husband, Richard, with a hammer. At trial, with no visible signs of injury to show she was a domestic abuse victim, she was depicted as motivated by jealousy and sentenced to 22 years, later reduced to 18 years.

Her claim of diminished responsibility on the basis of 40 years of abusive, humiliating, degrading and controlling behaviour was unsuccessful. Her husband used sexual violence and humiliation to control her, isolated her, and would taunt her with his infidelities and convince her she could not trust her own sanity.

In March, however, Sally and her legal team won the right to appeal her conviction on the grounds of fresh evidence in the form of increased understanding of coercive control.

For more information, contact Nic Mainwood at n.mainwood@centreforwomensjustice.org.uk or phone 07903 912641.

Issue: 7793 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll