header-logo header-logo

Change for the worse

25 November 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7724_jack

Adrian Jack rejects the government’s recent proposals for judicial reform

The Ministry of Justice is consulting on wide-ranging changes to the judiciary’s career paths and terms and conditions. The changes are largely negative for the judiciary and will further damage judicial morale.

The judicial career

The Neuberger Panel on Judicial Diversity back in 2010 recommended that efforts to promote diversity should concentrate on promoting a “judicial career”. The Commission never gave any examples of what a realistic career might be save that it “should be able to span roles in the courts and tribunals as one unified judiciary”. It recommended that fee-paid judges’ terms of office should end after three renewals (15 years). There was a consultation on the Neuberger recommendations and the proposal for limiting the length of holding office was rejected by the government. It would have led to too great a loss of experienced judges.

The latest consultation does not give examples of what a judicial career might look like either. Its particular proposal is that fee-paid judges should serve only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll