header-logo header-logo

25 November 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Change for the worse

nlj_7724_jack

Adrian Jack rejects the government’s recent proposals for judicial reform

The Ministry of Justice is consulting on wide-ranging changes to the judiciary’s career paths and terms and conditions. The changes are largely negative for the judiciary and will further damage judicial morale.

The judicial career

The Neuberger Panel on Judicial Diversity back in 2010 recommended that efforts to promote diversity should concentrate on promoting a “judicial career”. The Commission never gave any examples of what a realistic career might be save that it “should be able to span roles in the courts and tribunals as one unified judiciary”. It recommended that fee-paid judges’ terms of office should end after three renewals (15 years). There was a consultation on the Neuberger recommendations and the proposal for limiting the length of holding office was rejected by the government. It would have led to too great a loss of experienced judges.

The latest consultation does not give examples of what a judicial career might look like either. Its particular proposal is that fee-paid judges should serve only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll