header-logo header-logo

Change for the worse

25 November 2016 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7724_jack

Adrian Jack rejects the government’s recent proposals for judicial reform

The Ministry of Justice is consulting on wide-ranging changes to the judiciary’s career paths and terms and conditions. The changes are largely negative for the judiciary and will further damage judicial morale.

The judicial career

The Neuberger Panel on Judicial Diversity back in 2010 recommended that efforts to promote diversity should concentrate on promoting a “judicial career”. The Commission never gave any examples of what a realistic career might be save that it “should be able to span roles in the courts and tribunals as one unified judiciary”. It recommended that fee-paid judges’ terms of office should end after three renewals (15 years). There was a consultation on the Neuberger recommendations and the proposal for limiting the length of holding office was rejected by the government. It would have led to too great a loss of experienced judges.

The latest consultation does not give examples of what a judicial career might look like either. Its particular proposal is that fee-paid judges should serve only

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll