header-logo header-logo

Changing tack: beyond damages in M&A disputes

22 November 2024 / Yasseen Gailani , Megan Hiluta
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Procedure & practice , Damages
printer mail-detail
197683
Yasseen Gailani & Megan Hiluta consider the advantages of the little-used remedy of ‘specific performance’
  • Specific performance is a powerful yet rarely awarded remedy in English law M&A disputes.
  • Considering whether you want it available at the time of drafting the share performance agreement can greatly assist in obtaining the remedy should a dispute arise.
  • Acting quickly, and seeking specialist advice, is critical if specific performance is the remedy sought.

When most people think of litigation, and specifically the remedies sought in contractual disputes, the first, and sometimes only, remedy that comes to mind is damages. Yet there are many other remedies that can be sought. In this article we focus on the relatively rare, yet powerful, remedy of specific performance in the context of M&A disputes under English law, although some of the principles may have wider application.

What is specific performance?

Specific performance is an equitable remedy by which a court orders a defaulting party to comply with (or ‘specifically perform’)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Excello Law—five appointments

Excello Law—five appointments

Fee-share firm expands across key practice areas with senior appointments

Irwin Mitchell—Grace Morahan

Irwin Mitchell—Grace Morahan

International divorce team welcomes new hire

Switalskis—14 trainee solicitors

Switalskis—14 trainee solicitors

Firm welcomes largest training cohort in its history

NEWS
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll