header-logo header-logo

22 November 2024 / Yasseen Gailani , Megan Hiluta
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Procedure & practice , Damages
printer mail-detail

Changing tack: beyond damages in M&A disputes

197683
Yasseen Gailani & Megan Hiluta consider the advantages of the little-used remedy of ‘specific performance’
  • Specific performance is a powerful yet rarely awarded remedy in English law M&A disputes.
  • Considering whether you want it available at the time of drafting the share performance agreement can greatly assist in obtaining the remedy should a dispute arise.
  • Acting quickly, and seeking specialist advice, is critical if specific performance is the remedy sought.

When most people think of litigation, and specifically the remedies sought in contractual disputes, the first, and sometimes only, remedy that comes to mind is damages. Yet there are many other remedies that can be sought. In this article we focus on the relatively rare, yet powerful, remedy of specific performance in the context of M&A disputes under English law, although some of the principles may have wider application.

What is specific performance?

Specific performance is an equitable remedy by which a court orders a defaulting party to comply with (or ‘specifically perform’)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll