header-logo header-logo

Changing tack: beyond damages in M&A disputes

22 November 2024 / Yasseen Gailani , Megan Hiluta
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Procedure & practice , Damages
printer mail-detail
197683
Yasseen Gailani & Megan Hiluta consider the advantages of the little-used remedy of ‘specific performance’
  • Specific performance is a powerful yet rarely awarded remedy in English law M&A disputes.
  • Considering whether you want it available at the time of drafting the share performance agreement can greatly assist in obtaining the remedy should a dispute arise.
  • Acting quickly, and seeking specialist advice, is critical if specific performance is the remedy sought.

When most people think of litigation, and specifically the remedies sought in contractual disputes, the first, and sometimes only, remedy that comes to mind is damages. Yet there are many other remedies that can be sought. In this article we focus on the relatively rare, yet powerful, remedy of specific performance in the context of M&A disputes under English law, although some of the principles may have wider application.

What is specific performance?

Specific performance is an equitable remedy by which a court orders a defaulting party to comply with (or ‘specifically perform’)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll